On 4 December 2013 17:10, Russell Bryant <rbry...@redhat.com> wrote: > I think option 3 makes the most sense here (pending anyone saying we > should run away screaming from mox3 for some reason). It's actually > what I had been assuming since this thread a while back. > > This means that we don't need to *require* that tests get converted if > you're changing one. It just gets you bonus imaginary internet points. > > Requiring mock for new tests seems fine. We can grant exceptions in > specific cases if necessary. In general, we should be using mock for > new tests.
I have lost track a bit here. The above seems like a sane approach. Do we all agree on that now? Can we add the above text into here: https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/ReviewChecklist#Nova_Review_Checklist John _______________________________________________ OpenStack-dev mailing list OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.org http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
