On 12/20/2013 10:56 AM, Sean Dague wrote: > On 12/20/2013 09:59 AM, Sean Dague wrote: > <snip> >> So as Clint said, SIGHUP is only appropriate to do that *if* the process >> is daemonized. If it's in the foreground it's not. >> >> So that logic needs to be better. > > This is basically a blocker for adding any upgrade testing from > something later than havana. Grenade upstream is still functioning > because the service code wasn't merged into nova until after havana was cut. > > However there is a desire to do more interesting upgrade patterns, and > without the ability to shutdown nova services on master in the gate, > that's going to hit us pretty hard. > > So I'd like to get this fixed soon. As digging us out of this later is > going to be way more expensive.
Work around here for review - https://review.openstack.org/#/c/63444/ -Sean -- Sean Dague Samsung Research America s...@dague.net / sean.da...@samsung.com http://dague.net
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
_______________________________________________ OpenStack-dev mailing list OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.org http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev