On 12/20/2013 10:56 AM, Sean Dague wrote:
> On 12/20/2013 09:59 AM, Sean Dague wrote:
> <snip>
>> So as Clint said, SIGHUP is only appropriate to do that *if* the process
>> is daemonized. If it's in the foreground it's not.
>>
>> So that logic needs to be better.
> 
> This is basically a blocker for adding any upgrade testing from
> something later than havana. Grenade upstream is still functioning
> because the service code wasn't merged into nova until after havana was cut.
> 
> However there is a desire to do more interesting upgrade patterns, and
> without the ability to shutdown nova services on master in the gate,
> that's going to hit us pretty hard.
> 
> So I'd like to get this fixed soon. As digging us out of this later is
> going to be way more expensive.

Work around here for review - https://review.openstack.org/#/c/63444/

        -Sean

-- 
Sean Dague
Samsung Research America
s...@dague.net / sean.da...@samsung.com
http://dague.net

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature

_______________________________________________
OpenStack-dev mailing list
OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.org
http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev

Reply via email to