Confirmed. https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Climate/PTL_Elections_Icehouse#Candidates
On Fri, Dec 20, 2013 at 11:01 PM, Dina Belova <[email protected]> wrote: > Howdy, guys! > > I’d like to announce my candidacy for Climate (Reservation-as-a-Service) > PTL. > > I’m working with OpenStack about last two years since Diablo and have much > experience in working with different customers within different projects. > Last six months I’m everything about community work - since really early > ideas of Climate. I proposed idea of global reservation opportunity to the > OpenStack - for both virtual and physical resources, not just some of it. I > also created architecture proposal for the Climate, that was discussed with > our community and on what we agreed the time Climate was a ‘baby’. > > I’m leading subteam, that is working on implementing virtual reservations > opportunity. I took significant participation in core related features that > are important for every project - overall structure of DB layer, REST API, > base logic for the internal Climate part and plugin mechanism, that allows > to implement extensions for every resource type to make them reservable. > I’m a top contributor and reviewer for Climate and spend much time on > defining its future vectors of development and keeping Climate extensible > and relevant to the current OpenStack ecosystem. Now I’m holding our team’s > IRC meeting half times to keep our two subteams balanced and presented > enough; and manage our Launchpad project to represent every side of it. > Also I was the initiator of Climate presentation during OpenStack Icehouse > summit in Hong Kong this fall and prepared much materials for it. I have > expedience and know about release cycles, release management and other > infrastructure specific things. > > I think, PTL is not only about reviews or code writing, it’s more about > presenting project to the outside world. It’s about endless communication > both internally with people contributing to Climate and externally to avoid > overlaps and conflicts between contributors and Climate with other > projects. I believe, PTL should think not only about Climate itself, but > about its place in whole OpenStack ecosystem and how it may look like in > future. > > As for Icehouse, as the closest point we should pass, I defined our scope > for the first 0.1 Climate release and believe we will have it Jan 2014. > Definitely we would like to find the appropriate OpenStack Program (or > create a new one) and become incubated within it. Icehouse will be about > close integration with other OpenStack projects to support reservation of > different resources - not only compute hosts and virtual machines, proposed > to our first release, but also volumes, network resources, etc. Finally we > would like to propose architecture of integration with Heat and its stacks > reservation, as a most complicated virtual resource. Integration with > Horizon is also about creation of a better way for our users to communicate > with Climate and definitely we hope to propose solution for that. > > It was a great time when different companies and people decided to unite > and create this project with its special role and become a part of great > OpenStack community. I believe we’ll do even more in future :) > > Thanks! > Dina > > ----- > > Best regards, > > Dina Belova > > Software Engineer > > Mirantis Inc > > _______________________________________________ > OpenStack-dev mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev > > -- Sincerely yours, Sergey Lukjanov Savanna Technical Lead Mirantis Inc.
_______________________________________________ OpenStack-dev mailing list [email protected] http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
