On Wed, Oct 17, 2018 at 11:14 AM Alex Schultz <aschu...@redhat.com> wrote: > Additionally I took a stab at combining the puppet/docker service > definitions for the aodh services in a similar structure to start > reducing the overhead we've had from maintaining the docker/puppet > implementations seperately. You can see the patch > https://review.openstack.org/#/c/611188/ for an additional example of > this.
That patch takes the approach of removing baremetal support. Is that what we agreed to do? I'm not specifically opposed, as I'm pretty sure the baremetal implementations are no longer tested anywhere, but I know that Dan had some concerns about that last time around. The alternative we discussed was using jinja2 to include common data/tasks in both the puppet/docker/ansible implementations. That would also result in reducing the number of Heat resources in these stacks and hopefully reduce the amount of time it takes to create/update the ServiceChain stacks. -- -- James Slagle -- __________________________________________________________________________ OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev