On 11/5/18 3:21 AM, Mohammed Naser wrote:


Sent from my iPhone

On Nov 5, 2018, at 10:19 AM, Thierry Carrez <thie...@openstack.org> wrote:

Monty Taylor wrote:
[...]
What if we added support for serving vendor data files from the root of a 
primary URL as-per RFC 5785. Specifically, support deployers adding a json file 
to .well-known/openstack/client that would contain what we currently store in 
the openstacksdk repo and were just discussing splitting out.
[...]
What do people think?

I love the idea of public clouds serving that file directly, and the user 
experience you get from it. The only two drawbacks on top of my head would be:

- it's harder to discover available compliant openstack clouds from the client.

- there is no vetting process, so there may be failures with weird clouds 
serving half-baked files that people may blame the client tooling for.

I still think it's a good idea, as in theory it aligns the incentive of 
maintaining the file with the most interested stakeholder. It just might need 
some extra communication to work seamlessly.

I’m thinking out loud here but perhaps a simple linter that a cloud provider 
can run will help them make sure that everything is functional.

In fact, once we get it fleshed out and support added - perhaps we could add a tempest test that checks for a well-known file - and include it in compliance testing. Basically - if your cloud publishes a vendor profile, then the information in it should be accurate and should work, right?


__________________________________________________________________________
OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe
http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev

Reply via email to