On Tue, Dec 24 2013, Jay Pipes wrote: > I think you may have switched the above? Do you mean POST for sanity (short > URLs) and GET for compatibility/standards?
I don't think so, but maybe my sentence wasn't clear, sorry. I meant that in theory, the right verb to use would be GET as you pointed out. However, since using GET with a body is not a common practice, also supporting the POST verb as a replacement is a good idea for compatibility. > Can you elaborate why this is not something Ceilometer would be interested > in supporting? Would you prefer this kind of thing live in some other > component? I don't think there's any gain in storing data that are tight to a consumer application. Storing and retrieving this kind of data, and then executing this as a higher cost than just executing a query. Storing this kind of data to be executed later looks to me like we would start building some sort of light PaaS platform. I really don't think that's needed at this stage. -- Julien Danjou // Free Software hacker / independent consultant // http://julien.danjou.info
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ OpenStack-dev mailing list OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.org http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
