Thanks for the detailed update. This is very informative and useful. Thanks
On 12/31/13 11:58 PM, "Michael Still" <[email protected]> wrote: >Hi. > >So while turbo hipster is new, I've been reading every failure message >it produces to make sure its not too badly wrong. There were four >failures posted last night while I slept: > >https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v1/url?u=https://review.openstack.org/%2 >3/c/64521&k=oIvRg1%2BdGAgOoM1BIlLLqw%3D%3D%0A&r=eH0pxTUZo8NPZyF6hgoMQu%2Bf >Dtysg45MkPhCZFxPEq8%3D%0A&m=QjlZEwdZOsbG6HW%2FAwjBP1GxhEprFcAcOx%2Btg9BHc4 >Q%3D%0A&s=07845bb3c782af5c62d23c9234df0023cd3d37798ee2ae06d96ac2691419a647 >============================ > >This one is a TH bug. We shouldn't be testing stable branches. >bug/1265238 has been filed to track this. > >https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v1/url?u=https://review.openstack.org/%2 >3/c/61753&k=oIvRg1%2BdGAgOoM1BIlLLqw%3D%3D%0A&r=eH0pxTUZo8NPZyF6hgoMQu%2Bf >Dtysg45MkPhCZFxPEq8%3D%0A&m=QjlZEwdZOsbG6HW%2FAwjBP1GxhEprFcAcOx%2Btg9BHc4 >Q%3D%0A&s=c332d74b6bf0092724c0d10227d71f5ac8df6d0e48ca53d48054503c2e03d031 >============================ > >This is your review. The failed run's log is >https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v1/url?u=https://ssl.rcbops.com/turbo_hi >pster/logviewer/?q%3D/turbo_hipster/results/61/61753/8/check/gate-real-db- >upgrade_nova_percona_user_001/1326092/user_001.log&k=oIvRg1%2BdGAgOoM1BIlL >Lqw%3D%3D%0A&r=eH0pxTUZo8NPZyF6hgoMQu%2BfDtysg45MkPhCZFxPEq8%3D%0A&m=QjlZE >wdZOsbG6HW%2FAwjBP1GxhEprFcAcOx%2Btg9BHc4Q%3D%0A&s=de964203fc8fb25cd20a54a >ae34e35a175c3e9bb325e0d442b9a7b7ced78a8ad >and you can see from the failure message that migrations 152 and 206 >took "too long". > >Migration 152 took 326 seconds, where our historical data of 2,846 >test migrations says it should take 222 seconds. Migration 206 took 81 >seconds, where we think it should take 56 seconds based on 2,940 test >runs. > >Whilst I can't explain why those migrations took too long this time >around, they are certainly exactly the sort of thing TH is meant to >catch. If you think your patch isn't responsible (perhaps the machine >is just being slow or something), you can always retest by leaving a >review comment of "recheck migrations". I have done this for you on >this patch. > >https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v1/url?u=https://review.openstack.org/%2 >3/c/61717&k=oIvRg1%2BdGAgOoM1BIlLLqw%3D%3D%0A&r=eH0pxTUZo8NPZyF6hgoMQu%2Bf >Dtysg45MkPhCZFxPEq8%3D%0A&m=QjlZEwdZOsbG6HW%2FAwjBP1GxhEprFcAcOx%2Btg9BHc4 >Q%3D%0A&s=a4bc17a0cfe1ea90890c5468ae2ff8aa1a0a85cb546e641ef8f2588cfad3b9cc >============================ > >This review also had similar unexplained slowness, but has already >been rechecked by someone else and now passes. I note that the >slowness in both cases was from the same TH worker node, and I will >keep an eye on that node today. > >https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v1/url?u=https://review.openstack.org/%2 >3/c/56420&k=oIvRg1%2BdGAgOoM1BIlLLqw%3D%3D%0A&r=eH0pxTUZo8NPZyF6hgoMQu%2Bf >Dtysg45MkPhCZFxPEq8%3D%0A&m=QjlZEwdZOsbG6HW%2FAwjBP1GxhEprFcAcOx%2Btg9BHc4 >Q%3D%0A&s=4a4948f494e74e51749c2d43571071cdeaaef367a00a2f5ceca2ac06d2a0e862 >============================ > >This review also had slowness in migration 206, but has been rechecked >by the developer and now passes. It wasn't on the percona-001 worker >that the other two were on, so perhaps this indicates that we need to >relax the timing requirements for migration 206. > >Hope this helps, >Michael > >On Wed, Jan 1, 2014 at 12:34 AM, Gary Kotton <[email protected]> wrote: >> Hi, >> It seems that she/he is behaving oddly again. I have posted a patch that >> does not have any database changes and it has give me a 1Š. >> Happy new year >> Gary >> >> _______________________________________________ >> OpenStack-dev mailing list >> [email protected] >> >>https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v1/url?u=http://lists.openstack.org/cgi >>-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev&k=oIvRg1%2BdGAgOoM1BIlLLqw%3D%3D%0A&r >>=eH0pxTUZo8NPZyF6hgoMQu%2BfDtysg45MkPhCZFxPEq8%3D%0A&m=QjlZEwdZOsbG6HW%2F >>AwjBP1GxhEprFcAcOx%2Btg9BHc4Q%3D%0A&s=8ef5e4e15445067795d555001b6b8bdb4de >>8575c4691f682db06db4f35bce5fe >> > > > >-- >Rackspace Australia > >_______________________________________________ >OpenStack-dev mailing list >[email protected] >https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v1/url?u=http://lists.openstack.org/cgi- >bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev&k=oIvRg1%2BdGAgOoM1BIlLLqw%3D%3D%0A&r=e >H0pxTUZo8NPZyF6hgoMQu%2BfDtysg45MkPhCZFxPEq8%3D%0A&m=QjlZEwdZOsbG6HW%2FAwj >BP1GxhEprFcAcOx%2Btg9BHc4Q%3D%0A&s=8ef5e4e15445067795d555001b6b8bdb4de8575 >c4691f682db06db4f35bce5fe _______________________________________________ OpenStack-dev mailing list [email protected] http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
