On 01/08/2014 07:43 PM, Daniel P. Berrange wrote: > On Wed, Jan 01, 2014 at 02:33:09PM +0800, Thomas Goirand wrote: >> Hi, >> >> I was wondering if it would be possible for NoVNC to switch from >> websockify to sockjs-client, which is available here: >> >> https://github.com/sockjs/sockjs-client >> >> This has the advantage of not using flash at all (pure javascript), and >> continuing to work on all browsers, with a much cleaner licensing. > > What is the problem with licensing of websockify ? > > Daniel
First you have: include/web-socket-js/WebSocketMain.swf which isn't built from source in the package (so it's removed from the Debian package, making a +dfsg1 package), then there's lots of "minified" javascript, like: include/web-socket-js/swfobject.js Because WebSocketMain.swf is removed, this makes it a bit useless to use this project (as it will not carry the compatibility layer for the older browsers). sockjs-client doesn't have all of these problems, and is javascript only, which seems a lot cleaner (requiring flash... hum... do I have to explain why that's bad? :) ). Cheers, Thomas Goirand (zigo) _______________________________________________ OpenStack-dev mailing list [email protected] http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
