On 7 January 2014 08:50, Dugger, Donald D <donald.d.dug...@intel.com> wrote: > Pretty much what Vish said. > > In re: History. I think this was the right way, these scheduler files didn't > just spring up from nowhere, maintaining the history is a good thing. Even > when this becomes a separate service knowing where the files came from is a > good thing. > > In re: Changes to the current scheduler - I intend to track the nova tree and > port over any changes to the nova scheduler code into the gantt tree. > Hopefully, by the time the gantt code has diverged enough that this becomes a > burden we will have deprecated the nova scheduler code and have moved to > gantt.
We need to do the gantt client tree too, it's up but not sorted like the server is. This tree is what nova should import to get the RPC definitions to talk to gantt. -Rob -- Robert Collins <rbtcoll...@hp.com> Distinguished Technologist HP Converged Cloud _______________________________________________ OpenStack-dev mailing list OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.org http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
