On Fri, Jan 10, 2014 at 12:54 PM, Sergey Skripnick
<sskripn...@mirantis.com> wrote:
I appreciate that we want to fix the ssh client. I'm not certain that
writing our own is the >>>best >answer.
I was supposed to fix oslo.processutils.ssh with this class, but it may
be fixed without it, not big deal.
In his comments on your pull request, the paramiko author recommended
looking at Fabric. I know >>>that >Fabric has a long history in
production. Does it provide the required features?
Fabric is too much for just command execution on remote server. Spur
seems like
good choice for this.
But I still don't understand: why do we need oslo.processutils.execute?
We can use
subprocess module. Why do we need oslo.processutils.ssh_execute? We can
use paramiko
instead.
Well, as you've shown, having a wrapper around subprocess to deal with
the I/O properly is useful, >especially commands that produce a lot of
it. :-)
As far as ssh_execute goes, I don't know the origin but I imagine the
author didn't know about >paramiko.
Doug
ssh_execute is using paramiko :)
--
Regards,
Sergey Skripnick
_______________________________________________
OpenStack-dev mailing list
OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.org
http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
