On Thu, 2014-01-16 at 10:06 -0600, Dean Troyer wrote: > On Thu, Jan 16, 2014 at 9:37 AM, Jesse Noller > <jesse.nol...@rackspace.com> wrote: > On Jan 16, 2014, at 9:26 AM, Justin Hammond > <justin.hamm...@rackspace.com> wrote: > > I'm not sure if it was said, but which httplib using being > > used (urllib3 > > maybe?). Also I noticed many people were talking about > > supporting auth > > properly, but are there any intentions to properly support > > 'noauth' > > (python-neutronclient, for instance, doesn't support it > > properly as of > > this writing)? > > > Can you detail out noauth for me; and I would say the defacto > httplib in python today is python-requests - urllib3 is also > good but I would say from a *consumer* standpoint requests > offers more in terms of usability / extensibility > > > requests is built on top of urllib3 so there's that... > > > The biggest reaon I favor using Jamie Lennox's new session layer stuff > in keystoneclient is that it better reflects the requests API instead > of it being stuffed in after the fact. And as the one responsible for > that stuffing, it was pretty blunt and really needs to be cleaned up > more than Alessio did. > > > only a few libs (maybe just glance and swift?) don't use requests at > this point and I think the resistance there is the chunked transfers > they both do.
Right, but requests supports chunked-transfer encoding properly, so really there's no reason those clients could not move to a requests-based codebase. Best, -jay > > I'm really curious what 'noauth' means against APIs that have few, if > any, calls that operate without a valid token. > > > dt > > > -- > > Dean Troyer > dtro...@gmail.com > > _______________________________________________ > OpenStack-dev mailing list > OpenStackfirstname.lastname@example.org > http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev _______________________________________________ OpenStack-dev mailing list OpenStackemail@example.com http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev