On 16 January 2014 14:51, John Griffith <john.griff...@solidfire.com> wrote: > On Wed, Jan 15, 2014 at 6:41 PM, Michael Still <mi...@stillhq.com> wrote: >> John -- I agree with you entirely here. My concern is more that I >> think the CI tests need to run more frequently than weekly. > > Completely agree, but I guess in essence to start these aren't really > CI tests. Instead it's just a public health report for the various > drivers vendors provide. I'd love to see a higher frequency, but some > of us don't have the infrastructure to try and run a test against > every commit. Anyway, I think there's HUGE potential for growth and > adjustment as we go along. I'd like to get something in place to > solve the immediate problem first though.
You say you don't have the infrastructure - whats missing? What if you only ran against commits in the cinder trees? > To be honest I'd even be thrilled just to see every vendor publish a > passing run against each milestone cut. That in and of itself would > be a huge step in the right direction in my opinion. -Rob -- Robert Collins <rbtcoll...@hp.com> Distinguished Technologist HP Converged Cloud _______________________________________________ OpenStack-dev mailing list OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.org http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
