On Sun, Jan 19, 2014 at 9:30 PM, Robert Collins <robe...@robertcollins.net>wrote:
> On 20 January 2014 18:10, Alan Kavanagh <alan.kavan...@ericsson.com> > wrote: > > +1, that is another point Rob. When I started this thread my main > interest was disk and then firmware. It is clear we really need to have a > clear discussion on this, as imho I would not be supportive or lease > baremetal to tenants if I can not guarantee the service, otherwise the cost > of risking tenants to adverse attacks and data screening are far greater > that the revenue generated from the service. When it comes to the tenants > in our DC we consider all tenants need to be provided a guarantee of the > baremetal service on the disk, loaders etc etc, otherwise its difficult to > assure your customer. > > I think LXC/openVZ/Docker make pretty good compromises in this space > BTW - low overhead, bare metal performance, no root access to the > hardware. > > ++ Eg, when sized for single-instance-per-host, you'll get very similar performance without the disk/firmware/etc security issues. -Deva
_______________________________________________ OpenStack-dev mailing list OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.org http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
