Another +1 for option 3. Greg
On Jan 22, 2014, at 2:27 PM, Denis Makogon <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>> wrote: Goodday to all. #3 looks more than acceptable. /datastores/<datastore>/configuration/parameters. According to configuration parameters design, a configuration set must be associated to exactly one datastore. Best regards, Denis Makogon. 2014/1/22 Michael Basnight <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>> On Jan 22, 2014, at 10:19 AM, Kaleb Pomeroy wrote: > My thoughts so far: > > /datastores/<datastore>/configuration/parameters (Option Three) > + configuration set without an associated datastore is meaningless > + a configuration set must be associated to exactly one datastore > + each datastore must have 0-1 configuration set > + All above relationships are immediately apparent > - Listing all configuration sets becomes more difficult (which I don't think > that is a valid concern) +1 to option 3, given what kaleb and craig have outlined so far. I dont see the above minus as a valid concern either, kaleb. _______________________________________________ OpenStack-dev mailing list [email protected]<mailto:[email protected]> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev _______________________________________________ OpenStack-dev mailing list [email protected]<mailto:[email protected]> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
_______________________________________________ OpenStack-dev mailing list [email protected] http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
