Hi all, On Thu, Jan 09, 2014 at 01:13:53PM +0000, Derek Higgins wrote: > It looks like we have some duplication and inconsistencies on the 3 > os-*-config elements in the tripleo repositories > > os-apply-config (duplication) : > We have two elements that install this > diskimage-builder/elements/config-applier/ > tripleo-image-elements/elements/os-apply-config/ > > As far as I can tell the version in diskimage-builder isn't used by > tripleo and the upstart file is broke > ./dmesg:[ 13.336184] init: Failed to spawn config-applier main > process: unable to execute: No such file or directory > > To avoid confusion I propose we remove > diskimage-builder/elements/config-applier/ (or deprecated if we have a > suitable process) but would like to call it out here first to see if > anybody is using it or thinks its a bad idea?
Too late, it's already removed :) http://git.openstack.org/cgit/openstack/diskimage-builder/commit/?id=63a4c1e9d52d57e0f82a6fa2f89f745592f1a2de > inconsistencies > os-collect-config, os-refresh-config : these are both installed from > git into the global site-packages > os-apply-config : installed from a released tarball into its own venv > > To be consistent with the other elements all 3 I think should be > installed from git into its own venv, thoughts? > > If no objections I'll go ahead an do this next week, > I will add another one: Some elements are already using the old os-config-applier dir to store the configuration templates. It works, but I think is time to move them to os-apply-config to avoid confusion. Ghe Rivero _______________________________________________ OpenStack-dev mailing list [email protected] http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
