On 01/29/2014 07:27 PM, Robert Collins wrote: > On 30 January 2014 10:29, Sean Dague <[email protected]> wrote: > > >>> would (worker-N) be sufficient? Or do you want *'s/x's specifically? >> >> So if we had worker-N we could play with a filter above that layer to do >> UI formatting. >> >> Realistically I had a stream with enough metadata, and preferably a >> solid parsing lib for that stream (so I don't screw that part up), then >> we could handle the UI in a filter. >> >> Honestly, UX here is going to require the ability to iterate and >> experiment. In much the same way that we've got a completely >> disconnected visualization system for zuul from zuul itself, and only >> rarely do we need to touch zuul proper to improve status.openstack.org. > > Right - thats what subunit *is* - its decoupling :). > >>>> Question #2: where would this be injectable in the stream of testtools / >>>> subunit / testr / unittest? >>> >>> Long term I defintely want a richer UI in testr, but right now the >>> most appropriate thing to do is to prototype the UI you need locally. >> >> Sounds great. Again if we had some of the piece parts, I could do the >> rest of the UI locally, just diving down through the layers made me >> realize I really needed to figure out where to hook into, as it wasn't >> entirely clear (at least to me). > > https://review.openstack.org/#/c/70021/ > > both demonstrates the glue (subunit is the wire protocol, testtools > has the model level functions) and approximates what you've asked for > as a first iteration.
Awesome. Thank you!
-Sean
--
Sean Dague
Samsung Research America
[email protected] / [email protected]
http://dague.net
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
_______________________________________________ OpenStack-dev mailing list [email protected] http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
