Including openstack-dev ML in response.
On Fri, Jan 31, 2014 at 8:14 AM, wingwj <win...@gmail.com> wrote: > Hi, Mr Gordon, > > Firstly, sorry for my lately reply for this BP.. > https://blueprints.launchpad.net/nova/+spec/driver-for-huawei-fusioncompute > > Honestly speaking, we wrote the first FusionCompute Nova-driver on Folsom > edition, and now it has been updated with Havana. We maintained by ourselves. > > Now I have a question about your suggestion in whiteboard of this BP: > Is the CI environment a required term for this BP? Now Huawei is preparing > the CI environment for Nova & Neutron. > But due to the company's policy, it's not a easy thing to realize it rapidly. > We'll try our best for it. Yes, CI is a requirement for adding a new driver, please see: https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/HypervisorSupportMatrix http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-dev/2013-July/011260.html https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/HypervisorSupportMatrix/DeprecationPlan > > So can we commit the codes, and prepare the CI at the same time? That's a good question, I don't think that is feasible for Icehouse, but as far as I know we haven't fully discussed how to introduce new drivers now that we have the third party testing requirement. An alternate option is to add FusionCompute support to libvirt, and since nova already supports libvirt you will get nova support automatically. > > > P.S. Now we're also preparing some materials for introducing FusionCompute, > like Dan suggesting in whiteboard of this BP. But this week is the Chinese > Spring-Festival holiday, so this work may be finished latterly, so I hope we > can understand it. > > > Thanks very much. > > WingWJ _______________________________________________ OpenStack-dev mailing list OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.org http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
