On Mon, 2014-02-03 at 10:03 +0100, Flavio Percoco wrote: > IMHO, the bit that should really be optimized is the selection of the > store nodes where the image should be downloaded from. That is, > selecting the nearest location from the image locations and this is > something that perhaps should happen in glance-api, not nova.
I disagree. The reason is because glance-api does not know where nova is. Nova does. I continue to think that the best performance gains will come from getting rid of glance-api entirely, putting the block-streaming bits into a separate Python library, and having Nova and Cinder pull image/volume bits directly from backend storage instead of going through the glance middleman. Best, -jay _______________________________________________ OpenStack-dev mailing list OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.org http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
