On 02/ 5/14 03:24 PM, John Griffith wrote:
On Wed, Feb 5, 2014 at 3:09 PM, Jay S Bryant<[email protected]>  wrote:
Joe,

Ah!  So, those aren't for Cinder Volume but for nova-volume.  Ok, so there
isn't really a bug then.

Yep, this is left over from when volumes were in nova.
Thank you all for your comments. After Jay's initial response, I did file bug 1276828: https://bugs.launchpad.net/python-novaclient/+bug/1276828. Joe Gordon's comment made it sound like a bug is still present. But if that's no longer the case, please close that bug as you see fit. Minimally, I see this as something that could be addressed in documentation, if it hasn't already. I'll step back and let you decide the appropriate action with the bug. Thank you again.

Sincerely,
Pat

Sorry for speaking too quickly.  Thanks for the info!


Jay S. Bryant
        IBM Cinder Subject Matter Expert&   Cinder Core Member
Department 7YLA, Building 015-2, Office E125, Rochester, MN
Telephone: (507) 253-4270, FAX (507) 253-6410
TIE Line: 553-4270
E-Mail:  [email protected]
--------------------------------------------------------------------
All the world's a stage and most of us are desperately unrehearsed.
                   -- Sean O'Casey
--------------------------------------------------------------------



From:        Joe Gordon<[email protected]>
To:        "OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)"
<[email protected]>,
Date:        02/05/2014 04:03 PM
Subject:        Re: [openstack-dev] Grizzly volume quotas
________________________________



On Wed, Feb 5, 2014 at 1:21 PM, Jay S Bryant<[email protected]>  wrote:
Pat,

I see the same behavior on an Icehouse level install.  So, I think you may
have found a bug.
So the bug here isn't what you expect.

First a bit of background.

* python-novaclient isn't part of the integrated release and needs to
support most releases (not just the most recent).
* python-novaclient doesn't have any mechanism to detect what commands
a cloud supports and hide the other commands  [This is the bug].

So nova client needs to support nova-volume, which is why we still
have the volume quota options.

I would open the bug to python-novaclient to start with, but it may end up
coming back to Cinder.


Jay S. Bryant
        IBM Cinder Subject Matter Expert&   Cinder Core Member
Department 7YLA, Building 015-2, Office E125, Rochester, MN
Telephone: (507) 253-4270, FAX (507) 253-6410
TIE Line: 553-4270
E-Mail:  [email protected]
--------------------------------------------------------------------
All the world's a stage and most of us are desperately unrehearsed.
                   -- Sean O'Casey
--------------------------------------------------------------------



From:        Pat Bredenberg<[email protected]>
To:        [email protected],
Date:        02/05/2014 03:05 PM
Subject:        [openstack-dev] Grizzly volume quotas
________________________________



Dear all,

     I'm part of the team bringing OpenStack to Solaris and am confused
about how volume quotas appear according to nova(1).  We're using
Grizzly 2013.1.4 for both Nova and Cinder; please let me know what other
configuration information you need.  The raw data itself is available
here: http://paste.openstack.org/show/62667/.
     Is it a bug that "volumes" appears as a configurable quota via
nova(1), according to its help menu?  I'll apologize in advance if this
has already been documented elsewhere and/or addressed in Havana or
Icehouse.  I searched but didn't see it mentioned.  If it's a bug that
has yet to be filed and should be addressed, please let me know and I'll
gladly file the bug.  Otherwise, I'll chalk it up as a learning
experience.  Your guidance is greatly appreciated.

Very respectfully,
Pat Bredenberg

_______________________________________________
OpenStack-dev mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev



_______________________________________________
OpenStack-dev mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev

_______________________________________________
OpenStack-dev mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev



_______________________________________________
OpenStack-dev mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev

_______________________________________________
OpenStack-dev mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev


_______________________________________________
OpenStack-dev mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev

Reply via email to