On 02/06/2014 08:47 AM, Thierry Carrez wrote: > Dina Belova wrote: >> Perhaps we should start putting each project on the TC agenda for a >> review of its current standing. For any gaps, I think we should set a >> specific timeframe for when we expect these gaps to be filled. >> >> >> Really good idea. New requirements are great, but frankly speaking not >> all currently integrated projects fit all of them. >> Will be nice to find out all gaps there and fix them asap. > > Agreed. I propose we do this in future TC meetings, time permitting. I > propose we start with projects where the PTL was also elected to the TC, > so that we give this new review's process some mileage. > > So.. Nova, Cinder, Neutron ? >
Sounds good to me. How about we do them in the order you specified. I'll go ahead and put together a wiki page that discusses the state of Nova against the requirements to help the review along. John and Mark, do you think you could do the same for Cinder/Neutron at some point in the next couple weeks? -- Russell Bryant _______________________________________________ OpenStack-dev mailing list OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.org http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev