Agree to rename this legacy field to ‘version’. Adding to John's words about HDP, Vanilla plugin is able to run different hadoop versions by doing some manipulations with DIB scripts :-) So the right name of this field should be ‘version’ as version of engine of concrete plugin.
Regards, Alexander Ignatov On 18 Feb 2014, at 01:01, John Speidel <jspei...@hortonworks.com> wrote: > Andrew +1 > > The HDP plugin also returns the HDP distro version. The version needs to > make sense in the context of the plugin. > Also, many plugins including the HDP plugin will support deployment of > several hadoop versions. > > -John > > > On Mon, Feb 17, 2014 at 2:36 PM, Andrew Lazarev <alaza...@mirantis.com> wrote: > IDH uses version of IDH distro and there is no direct mapping between distro > version and hadoop version. E.g. IDH 2.5.1 works with apache hadoop 1.0.3. > > I suggest to call the field as just 'version' everywhere and assume this > version as plugin specific property. > > Andrew. > > > On Mon, Feb 17, 2014 at 5:06 AM, Matthew Farrellee <m...@redhat.com> wrote: > $ savanna plugins-list > +---------+----------+---------------------------+ > | name | versions | title | > +---------+----------+---------------------------+ > | vanilla | 1.2.1 | Vanilla Apache Hadoop | > | hdp | 1.3.2 | Hortonworks Data Platform | > +---------+----------+---------------------------+ > > above is output from the /plugins endpoint - > http://docs.openstack.org/developer/savanna/userdoc/rest_api_v1.0.html#plugins > > the question is, should the version be the version of the plugin or the > version of hadoop the plugin installs? > > i ask because it seems like we have version == plugin version for hdp and > version == hadoop version for vanilla. > > the documentation is somewhat vague on the subject, mostly stating "version" > without qualification. however, the json passed to the service references > "hadoop_version" and the arguments in the client are called "hadoop_version" > > fyi, this could be complicated by the idh and spark plugins. > > best, > > > matt > > _______________________________________________ > OpenStack-dev mailing list > OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.org > http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev > > > _______________________________________________ > OpenStack-dev mailing list > OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.org > http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev > > > > CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE > NOTICE: This message is intended for the use of the individual or entity to > which it is addressed and may contain information that is confidential, > privileged and exempt from disclosure under applicable law. If the reader of > this message is not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any > printing, copying, dissemination, distribution, disclosure or forwarding of > this communication is strictly prohibited. If you have received this > communication in error, please contact the sender immediately and delete it > from your system. Thank You._______________________________________________ > OpenStack-dev mailing list > OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.org > http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
_______________________________________________ OpenStack-dev mailing list OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.org http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
