On Tue, Feb 18, 2014 at 12:27 AM, Gary Kotton <gkot...@vmware.com> wrote:

> Thanks!
> That makes sense. Just odd how a -1 was received.
>
>
So I think that now a "check" run is automatically done if the latest
Jenkins run is too old (7 days?)
This is done because gate failures are so costly. The check run failing
would return -1 instead of a
gate failure of -2.




> On 2/17/14 3:15 PM, "Akihiro Motoki" <mot...@da.jp.nec.com> wrote:
>
> >Hi Gary,
> >
> >According to zuul layout.yaml [1], "reverify bug #" should still work
> >but it seems to work only when verified score from jenkins is -2.
> >
> https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v1/url?u=https://github.com/openstack-in
> >fra/config/blob/master/modules/openstack_project/files/zuul/layout.yaml%23
> >L25&k=oIvRg1%2BdGAgOoM1BIlLLqw%3D%3D%0A&r=eH0pxTUZo8NPZyF6hgoMQu%2BfDtysg4
> >5MkPhCZFxPEq8%3D%0A&m=Nf6%2FyHMSSchQO59xIcg6NKX1O2wlkkHHd42bYQim0k0%3D%0A&
> >s=8fc4d7e6970936977dc85989e4e7e9429afb15f5091a768efa4ce236417d9c9b
> >
> >Note that core team can trigger gate jobs by re-approving the patch.
> >
> >Thanks,
> >Akihiro
> >
> >(2014/02/17 22:03), Gary Kotton wrote:
> >> Hi,
> >> The "reverify no bug" was removed. But "reverify bug #" used to work.
> >>That no longer does. With the constant gate failures how can we ensure
> >>that a approved patch does a retry?
> >> Thanks
> >> Gary
> >>
> >> From: Sylvain Bauza <sylvain.ba...@gmail.com
> >><mailto:sylvain.ba...@gmail.com>>
> >> Reply-To: "OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage
> >>questions)" <openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org
> >><mailto:openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org>>
> >> Date: Monday, February 17, 2014 2:53 PM
> >> To: "OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)"
> >><openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org
> >><mailto:openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org>>
> >> Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [infra] reverify/recheck
> >>
> >> Hi Gary,
> >>
> >> That's normal, this command has been removed since Dec'13, see
> >>
> https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v1/url?u=http://lists.openstack.org/pip
> >>ermail/openstack-dev/2013-December/021649.html&k=oIvRg1%2BdGAgOoM1BIlLLqw
> >>%3D%3D%0A&r=eH0pxTUZo8NPZyF6hgoMQu%2BfDtysg45MkPhCZFxPEq8%3D%0A&m=Nf6%2Fy
> >>HMSSchQO59xIcg6NKX1O2wlkkHHd42bYQim0k0%3D%0A&s=826274ca8ad9562b557322274a
> >>cdacd97482338456820af8c330b76ea7639838
> >>
> >><
> https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v1/url?u=http://lists.openstack.org/pi
> >>permail/openstack-dev/2013-December/021649.html&k=oIvRg1%2BdGAgOoM1BIlLLq
> >>w%3D%3D%0A&r=eH0pxTUZo8NPZyF6hgoMQu%2BfDtysg45MkPhCZFxPEq8%3D%0A&m=B8yQ75
> >>uRFa7dyD%2FbgPgO%2FMT2x229MkK1vHWBVAzpFtM%3D%0A&s=d9cbcbde99b7c88c15ca138
> >>499de8f36edd4247ce351e41b241d675b09b79956>
> >>
> >> -Sylvain
> >>
> >>
> >> 2014-02-17 13:00 GMT+01:00 Gary Kotton <gkot...@vmware.com
> >><mailto:gkot...@vmware.com>>:
> >>
> >>     Hi,
> >>     It seems that the command 'reverify bug <number>' is not working.
> >>Anyone else experienced this lately.
> >>     Thanks
> >>     Gary
> >>
> >>     _______________________________________________
> >>     OpenStack-dev mailing list
> >>     OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.org
> >><mailto:OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.org>
> >>
> >>
> https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v1/url?u=http://lists.openstack.org/cgi
> >>-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev&k=oIvRg1%2BdGAgOoM1BIlLLqw%3D%3D%0A&r
> >>=eH0pxTUZo8NPZyF6hgoMQu%2BfDtysg45MkPhCZFxPEq8%3D%0A&m=Nf6%2FyHMSSchQO59x
> >>Icg6NKX1O2wlkkHHd42bYQim0k0%3D%0A&s=1a2a59024e18b786b5c2c13535b7f3d050363
> >>ff628dc96b8561e12489d30c0bd
> >>
> >><
> https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v1/url?u=http://lists.openstack.org/cg
> >>i-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev&k=oIvRg1%2BdGAgOoM1BIlLLqw%3D%3D%0A&
> >>r=eH0pxTUZo8NPZyF6hgoMQu%2BfDtysg45MkPhCZFxPEq8%3D%0A&m=B8yQ75uRFa7dyD%2F
> >>bgPgO%2FMT2x229MkK1vHWBVAzpFtM%3D%0A&s=21e7f4ebc24f0a13780981720f9332111d
> >>d603f3c0661229dc90d82bfb5c3122>
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> _______________________________________________
> >> OpenStack-dev mailing list
> >> OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.org
> >>
> >>
> https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v1/url?u=http://lists.openstack.org/cgi
> >>-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev&k=oIvRg1%2BdGAgOoM1BIlLLqw%3D%3D%0A&r
> >>=eH0pxTUZo8NPZyF6hgoMQu%2BfDtysg45MkPhCZFxPEq8%3D%0A&m=Nf6%2FyHMSSchQO59x
> >>Icg6NKX1O2wlkkHHd42bYQim0k0%3D%0A&s=1a2a59024e18b786b5c2c13535b7f3d050363
> >>ff628dc96b8561e12489d30c0bd
> >>
> >_______________________________________________
> >OpenStack-dev mailing list
> >OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.org
> >
> https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v1/url?u=http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-
> >bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev&k=oIvRg1%2BdGAgOoM1BIlLLqw%3D%3D%0A&r=e
> >H0pxTUZo8NPZyF6hgoMQu%2BfDtysg45MkPhCZFxPEq8%3D%0A&m=Nf6%2FyHMSSchQO59xIcg
> >6NKX1O2wlkkHHd42bYQim0k0%3D%0A&s=1a2a59024e18b786b5c2c13535b7f3d050363ff62
> >8dc96b8561e12489d30c0bd
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> OpenStack-dev mailing list
> OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.org
> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
>
_______________________________________________
OpenStack-dev mailing list
OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.org
http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev

Reply via email to