Thomas, I feel your frustration, however before complaining please do follow the actual chain of events.
Patch [1]: I asked a question which I never received an answer to. Patch [2]: I did put a -1, but I have nothing against this patch per se. This was only been recently abandoned and my -1 lied primarily to give patch [1] the opportunity to be resumed. No action on a negative review means automatic expiration, if you lose interest in something you care about whose fault is that? A. [1] = https://review.openstack.org/#/c/52757 [2] = https://review.openstack.org/#/c/68611 On 19 February 2014 06:28, Thomas Goirand <[email protected]> wrote: > Hi, > > I've seen this one: > https://review.openstack.org/#/c/68611/ > > which is suppose to fix something for Postgress. This is funny, because > I was doing the exact same patch for fixing it for SQLite. Though this > was before the last summit in HK. > > Since then, I just gave up on having my Debian specific patch [1] being > upstreamed. No review, despite my insistence. Mark, on the HK summit, > told me that it was pending discussion about what would be the policy > for SQLite. > > Guys, this is disappointing. That's the 2nd time the same patch is being > blocked, with no explanations. > > Could 2 core reviewers have a *serious* look at this patch, and explain > why it's not ok for it to be approved? If nobody says why, then could > this be approved, so we can move on? > > Cheers, > > Thomas Goirand (zigo) > > [1] > http://anonscm.debian.org/gitweb/?p=openstack/neutron.git;a=blob;f=debian/patches/fix-alembic-migration-with-sqlite3.patch;h=9108b45aaaf683e49b15338bacd813e50e9f563d;hb=b44e96d9e1d750e35513d63877eb05f167a175d8 > > _______________________________________________ > OpenStack-dev mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev _______________________________________________ OpenStack-dev mailing list [email protected] http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
