On Fri, 21 Feb 2014 06:53:11 +0000 Kenichi Oomichi <oomi...@mxs.nes.nec.co.jp> wrote:
> > -----Original Message----- > > From: Christopher Yeoh [mailto:cbky...@gmail.com] > > Sent: Thursday, February 20, 2014 11:44 AM > > To: openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org > > Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [Nova] v3 API in Icehouse > > > > On Wed, 19 Feb 2014 12:36:46 -0500 > > Russell Bryant <rbry...@redhat.com> wrote: > > > > > Greetings, > > > > > > The v3 API effort has been going for a few release cycles now. > > > As we approach the Icehouse release, we are faced with the > > > following question: "Is it time to mark v3 stable?" > > > > > > My opinion is that I think we need to leave v3 marked as > > > experimental for Icehouse. > > > > > > > Although I'm very eager to get the V3 API released, I do agree with > > you. As you have said we will be living with both the V2 and V3 > > APIs for a very long time. And at this point there would be simply > > too many last minute changes to the V3 API for us to be confident > > that we have it right "enough" to release as a stable API. > > Through v3 API development, we have found a lot of the existing v2 API > input validation problems. but we have concentrated v3 API development > without fixing the problems of v2 API. > > After Icehouse release, v2 API would be still CURRENT and v3 API would > be EXPERIMENTAL. So should we fix v2 API problems also in the > remaining Icehouse cycle? > So bug fixes are certainly fine with the usual caveats around backwards compatibility (I think there's a few in there that aren't backwards compatible especially those that fall into the category of making the API more consistent). https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/APIChangeGuidelines Chris _______________________________________________ OpenStack-dev mailing list OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.org http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
