On 02/25/2014 05:47 PM, Dan Smith wrote: >> Yeah, so objects is the big one here. > > Objects, and everything else. With no-db-compute we did it for a couple > cycles, then objects, next it will be retooling flows to conductor, then > dealing with tasks, talking to gantt, etc. It's not going to end any > time soon. > >> So what kind of reaction are the Keystone people getting to that? Do >> they plan on removing their V2 API at some point? Or just maintain it >> with bug fixes forever? > > Yep, that would be good data. We also need to factor in the relative > deployment scale of nova installations vs. keystone installations in the > world (AFAIK, RAX doesn't use keystone for example).
The Keystone API is also much smaller. The path from glance v1 to v2 is another interesting data point. Despite being a much smaller API surface, Glance has had both v1 and v2 for quite some time. I'm not sure of the history or expected timeline for v1 to go away, though. -- Russell Bryant _______________________________________________ OpenStack-dev mailing list OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.org http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev