On Thu, Feb 27, 2014 at 2:00 AM, Noorul Islam K M <[email protected]> wrote:
> Michael Davies <[email protected]> writes: > > > Hi everyone, > > > > Over in "Ironic Land" we're looking at removing XML support from > ironic-api > > (i.e. https://bugs.launchpad.net/ironic/+bug/1271317) > > > > I've been looking, but I can't seem to find an easy way to modify the > > accepted content_types. > > > > Are there any wsgi / WSME / Pecan experts out there who can point me in > the > > right direction? > > > > Also in Solum we have a use case where in we would like to have > pecan+wsme accept content-type application/x-yaml. > > It will be great if this can be made configurable. > What do you want to have happen with the YAML? Do you want to receive and return YAML to a bunch of API calls? We could add YAML protocol support to WSME to make that happen. Do you want a couple of controller methods to be given a YAML parse result, rather than WSME objects? You could write an expose() decorator for Pecan in Solum. This would be a more appropriate approach if you just have one or two methods of the API that need YAML support. Or do you want the YAML text passed in to you directly, maybe to be uploaded in a single controller method? You should be able to have that by skipping WSME and just using Pecan's expose() decorator with an appropriate content type, then parsing the body yourself. Doug > > Regards, > Noorul > > _______________________________________________ > OpenStack-dev mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev >
_______________________________________________ OpenStack-dev mailing list [email protected] http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
