On 03/03/2014 04:25 PM, Vishvananda Ishaya wrote: > This seems like a reasonable and well thought out approach but It > feels like we are removing our ability to innovate.
I think part of this exercise is trying to think through what freedom we *would* have to innovate in v2 with a set of changes to code an policy. That's what most of the proposal is about. If we still don't have the freedom we need, that's a problem and is what we need to figure out before this s final. Are there particular cases that you feel are missing in a v2 world described by the proposal? > I’m worried that this is just delaying solving the inconsistency > issues to some future date. It depends which consistency issues you're talking about. Many of them I think we can fix today. Others the argument being made is that they just aren't nearly important enough to fix yet unless they're coming with a completely new API. Which inconsistencies are you concerned about in particular? What did we miss in the proposal or which part specifically do you disagree with? -- Russell Bryant _______________________________________________ OpenStack-dev mailing list OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.org http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
