On 03/05/2014 03:40 PM, Yathiraj Udupi (yudupi) wrote: > Hi, > > We would like to make a request for FFE for the Solver Scheduler work. > A lot of work has gone into it since Sep’13, and the first patch has > gone through several iteration after some reviews. The first patch > - https://review.openstack.org/#/c/46588/ introduces the main solver > scheduler driver, and a reference solver implementation, and the > subsequent patches that are already added provide the pluggable solver, > and individual support for adding constraints, costs, etc. > > First Patch: https://review.openstack.org/#/c/46588/ > Second patch with enhanced support for pluggable constraints and costs: > - https://review.openstack.org/#/c/70654/ > <https://review.openstack.org/#/c/70654/> > Subsequent patches add the constraints and the costs. > BP: https://blueprints.launchpad.net/nova/+spec/solver-scheduler > Core sponsor: Joe Gordon > > John Garbutt expressed concerns in Blueprint whiteboard regarding the > configuration values, existing filters,etc and I noticed that you have > un-approved this BP. > John, I will discuss with you in detail over IRC. > But briefly, the plan is not many new configuration values will be > added, just the ones to specify the solver to use, and the pluggable > constraints, and costs to use, with the weights for the costs. (these > are mainly part of the second patch - > https://review.openstack.org/#/c/70654/ > <https://review.openstack.org/#/c/70654/> ) > > The plan is to gradually support the concepts for the existing filters > as the constraints that are accepted by our Solver Scheduler. > Depending on the constraints and the costs chosen, the final scheduling > will be done by solving the problem as an optimization problem. > > Please reconsider this blueprint, and allow a FFE. > > Thanks, > Yathi. > > > > _______________________________________________ > OpenStack-dev mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev >
This does not seem small or low risk in any way. And the blueprint is
not currently approved.
Also, as far as I can tell you never actually talked with Joe Gordon
about him supporting the FFE.
-2
This needs to wait for Juno.
-Sean
--
Sean Dague
Samsung Research America
[email protected] / [email protected]
http://dague.net
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
_______________________________________________ OpenStack-dev mailing list [email protected] http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
