+1. Count me in. Susanne
On Fri, Mar 7, 2014 at 10:06 AM, Stephen Wong <s3w...@midokura.com> wrote: > +1 - that is a good idea! Having it several days before the J-Summit in > Atlanta would be great. > > - Stephen > > > On Fri, Mar 7, 2014 at 1:33 AM, Eugene Nikanorov > <enikano...@mirantis.com>wrote: > >> I think mini summit is no worse than the summit itself. >> Everyone who wants to participate can join. >> In fact what we really need is a certain time span of focused work. >> ML, meetings are ok, it's just that dedicated in person meetings (design >> sessions) could be more productive. >> I'm thinking what if such mini-summit is held in Atlanta 1-2-3 days prior >> to the OS summit? >> That could save attendees a lot of time/money. >> >> Thanks, >> Eugene. >> >> >> >> On Fri, Mar 7, 2014 at 9:51 AM, Mark McClain <mmccl...@yahoo-inc.com>wrote: >> >>> >>> On Mar 6, 2014, at 4:31 PM, Jay Pipes <jaypi...@gmail.com> wrote: >>> >>> > On Thu, 2014-03-06 at 21:14 +0000, Youcef Laribi wrote: >>> >> +1 >>> >> >>> >> I think if we can have it before the Juno summit, we can take >>> >> concrete, well thought-out proposals to the community at the summit. >>> > >>> > Unless something has changed starting at the Hong Kong design summit >>> > (which unfortunately I was not able to attend), the design summits have >>> > always been a place to gather to *discuss* and *debate* proposed >>> > blueprints and design specs. It has never been about a gathering to >>> > rubber-stamp proposals that have already been hashed out in private >>> > somewhere else. >>> >>> You are correct that is the goal of the design summit. While I do think >>> it is wise to discuss the next steps with LBaaS at this point in time, I am >>> not a proponent of in person mini-design summits. Many contributors to >>> LBaaS are distributed all over the global, and scheduling a mini summit >>> with short notice will exclude valuable contributors to the team. I'd >>> prefer to see an open process with discussions on the mailing list and >>> specially scheduled IRC meetings to discuss the ideas. >>> >>> mark >>> >>> >>> _______________________________________________ >>> OpenStack-dev mailing list >>> OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.org >>> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev >>> >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> OpenStack-dev mailing list >> OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.org >> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev >> >> > > _______________________________________________ > OpenStack-dev mailing list > OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.org > http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev > >
_______________________________________________ OpenStack-dev mailing list OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.org http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev