On Mar 10, 2014, at 1:26 PM, Georgy Okrokvertskhov <gokrokvertsk...@mirantis.com> wrote:
> Hi, > > Thomas and Zane initiated a good discussion about Murano DSL and TOSCA > initiatives in Heat. I think will be beneficial for both teams to contribute > into TOSCA. Wasn't TOSCA developing a "simplified" version in order to converge with HOT? > While Mirantis is working on organizational part for OASIS. I would like to > understand what is the current view on the TOSCA and HOT relations. > It looks like TOSCA can cover all aspects of declarative components HOT > templates and imperative workflows which can be covered by Murano. What do > you think about that? Aren't workflows covered by Mistral? How would this be different than including mistral support in Heat? > I think TOSCA format can be used a a descriptions of Applications and > heat-translator can actually convert TOSCA descriptions to both HOT and > Murano files which can be then used for actual Application deployment. Both > Het and Murano workflows can coexist in Orchestration program and cover both > declarative templates and imperative workflows use cases. > > -- > Georgy Okrokvertskhov > Architect, > OpenStack Platform Products, > Mirantis > http://www.mirantis.com > Tel. +1 650 963 9828 > Mob. +1 650 996 3284 > _______________________________________________ > OpenStack-dev mailing list > OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.org > http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev _______________________________________________ OpenStack-dev mailing list OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.org http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
