Thanks for your answer.
Best Regards,
Racha
On Mon, Mar 17, 2014 at 3:17 AM, Mathieu Rohon
<[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:
Hi racha,
I don't think your topic has something to deal with Nader's topics.
Please, create another topic, it would be easier to follow.
FYI, robert kukura is currently refactoring the MD binding, please
have a look here : https://bugs.launchpad.net/neutron/+bug/1276391. As
i understand, there won't be priority between MD that can bind a same
port. The first that will respond to the binding request will give its
vif_type.
Best,
Mathieu
On Fri, Mar 14, 2014 at 8:14 PM, racha <[email protected]
<mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:
> Hi,
> Is it possible (in the latest upstream) to partition the same
> integration bridge "br-int" into multiple isolated partitions
(in terms of
> lvids ranges, patch ports, etc.) between OVS mechanism driver
and ODL
> mechanism driver? And then how can we pass some details to
Neutron API (as
> in the provider segmentation type/id/etc) so that ML2 assigns a
mechanism
> driver to the virtual network? The other alternative I guess is
to create
> another integration bridge managed by a different Neutron
instance? Probably
> I am missing something.
>
> Best Regards,
> Racha
>
>
> On Fri, Mar 7, 2014 at 10:33 AM, Nader Lahouti
<[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>>
> wrote:
>>
>> 1) Does it mean an interim solution is to have our own plugin
(and have
>> all the changes in it) and declare it as core_plugin instead of
Ml2Plugin?
>>
>> 2) The other issue as I mentioned before, is that the
extension(s) is not
>> showing up in the result, for instance when create_network is
called
>> [result = super(Ml2Plugin, self).create_network(context,
network)], and as
>> a result they cannot be used in the mechanism drivers when needed.
>>
>> Looks like the process_extensions is disabled when fix for Bug
1201957
>> committed and here is the change:
>> Any idea why it is disabled?
>>
>> ----------
>> Avoid performing extra query for fetching port security binding
>>
>> Bug 1201957
>>
>>
>> Add a relationship performing eager load in Port and Network
>>
>> models, thus preventing the 'extend' function from performing
>>
>> an extra database query.
>>
>> Also fixes a comment in securitygroups_db.py
>>
>>
>> Change-Id: If0f0277191884aab4dcb1ee36826df7f7d66a8fa
>>
>> master h.1
>>
>> ...
>>
>> 2013.2
>>
>> commit f581b2faf11b49852b0e1d6f2ddd8d19b8b69cdf 1 parent ca421e7
>>
>> Salvatore Orlando salv-orlando authored 8 months ago
>>
>>
>> 2 neutron/db/db_base_plugin_v2.py View
>>
>> @@ -995,7 +995,7 @@ def create_network(self, context, network):
>>
>> 995 'status': constants.NET_STATUS_ACTIVE}
>>
>> 996 network = models_v2.Network(**args)
>>
>> 997 context.session.add(network)
>>
>> 998 - return self._make_network_dict(network)
>>
>> 998 + return self._make_network_dict(network,
>> process_extensions=False)
>>
>> 999
>>
>> 1000 def update_network(self, context, id, network):
>>
>> 1001
>>
>> n = network['network']
>>
>>
>> -----------------------
>>
>>
>> Regards,
>> Nader.
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> On Fri, Mar 7, 2014 at 6:26 AM, Robert Kukura
<[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>>
>> wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>> On 3/7/14, 3:53 AM, Édouard Thuleau wrote:
>>>
>>> Yes, that sounds good to be able to load extensions from a
mechanism
>>> driver.
>>>
>>> But another problem I think we have with ML2 plugin is the list
>>> extensions supported by default [1].
>>> The extensions should only load by MD and the ML2 plugin
should only
>>> implement the Neutron core API.
>>>
>>>
>>> Keep in mind that ML2 supports multiple MDs simultaneously, so
no single
>>> MD can really control what set of extensions are active.
Drivers need to be
>>> able to load private extensions that only pertain to that
driver, but we
>>> also need to be able to share common extensions across subsets
of drivers.
>>> Furthermore, the semantics of the extensions need to be
correct in the face
>>> of multiple co-existing drivers, some of which know about the
extension, and
>>> some of which don't. Getting this properly defined and
implemented seems
>>> like a good goal for juno.
>>>
>>> -Bob
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> Any though ?
>>> Édouard.
>>>
>>> [1]
>>>
https://github.com/openstack/neutron/blob/master/neutron/plugins/ml2/plugin.py#L87
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> On Fri, Mar 7, 2014 at 8:32 AM, Akihiro Motoki
<[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:
>>>>
>>>> Hi,
>>>>
>>>> I think it is better to continue the discussion here. It is a
good log
>>>> :-)
>>>>
>>>> Eugine and I talked the related topic to allow drivers to load
>>>> extensions) in Icehouse Summit
>>>> but I could not have enough time to work on it during Icehouse.
>>>> I am still interested in implementing it and will register a
blueprint
>>>> on it.
>>>>
>>>> etherpad in icehouse summit has baseline thought on how to
achieve it.
>>>>
https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/icehouse-neutron-vendor-extension
>>>> I hope it is a good start point of the discussion.
>>>>
>>>> Thanks,
>>>> Akihiro
>>>>
>>>> On Fri, Mar 7, 2014 at 4:07 PM, Nader Lahouti
<[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>>
>>>> wrote:
>>>> > Hi Kyle,
>>>> >
>>>> > Just wanted to clarify: Should I continue using this
mailing list to
>>>> > post my
>>>> > question/concerns about ML2? Please advise.
>>>> >
>>>> > Thanks,
>>>> > Nader.
>>>> >
>>>> >
>>>> >
>>>> > On Thu, Mar 6, 2014 at 1:50 PM, Kyle Mestery
>>>> > <[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>>
>>>> > wrote:
>>>> >>
>>>> >> Thanks Edgar, I think this is the appropriate place to
continue this
>>>> >> discussion.
>>>> >>
>>>> >>
>>>> >> On Thu, Mar 6, 2014 at 2:52 PM, Edgar Magana
<[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>>
>>>> >> wrote:
>>>> >>>
>>>> >>> Nader,
>>>> >>>
>>>> >>> I would encourage you to first discuss the possible
extension with
>>>> >>> the
>>>> >>> ML2 team. Rober and Kyle are leading this effort and they
have a IRC
>>>> >>> meeting
>>>> >>> every week:
>>>> >>>
>>>> >>>
https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Meetings#ML2_Network_sub-team_meeting
>>>> >>>
>>>> >>> Bring your concerns on this meeting and get the right
feedback.
>>>> >>>
>>>> >>> Thanks,
>>>> >>>
>>>> >>> Edgar
>>>> >>>
>>>> >>> From: Nader Lahouti <[email protected]
<mailto:[email protected]>>
>>>> >>> Reply-To: OpenStack List
<[email protected]
<mailto:[email protected]>>
>>>> >>> Date: Thursday, March 6, 2014 12:14 PM
>>>> >>> To: OpenStack List <[email protected]
<mailto:[email protected]>>
>>>> >>> Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [Neutron][ML2]
>>>> >>>
>>>> >>> Hi Aaron,
>>>> >>>
>>>> >>> I appreciate your reply.
>>>> >>>
>>>> >>> Here is some more details on what I'm trying to do:
>>>> >>> I need to add new attribute to the network resource using
extensions
>>>> >>> (i.e. network config profile) and use it in the mechanism
driver (in
>>>> >>> the
>>>> >>> create_network_precommit/postcommit).
>>>> >>> If I use current implementation of Ml2Plugin, when a call
is made to
>>>> >>> mechanism driver's create_network_precommit/postcommit
the new
>>>> >>> attribute is
>>>> >>> not included in the 'mech_context'
>>>> >>> Here is code from Ml2Plugin:
>>>> >>> class Ml2Plugin(...):
>>>> >>> ...
>>>> >>> def create_network(self, context, network):
>>>> >>> net_data = network['network']
>>>> >>> ...
>>>> >>> with session.begin(subtransactions=True):
>>>> >>> self._ensure_default_security_group(context, tenant_id)
>>>> >>> result = super(Ml2Plugin,
self).create_network(context,
>>>> >>> network)
>>>> >>> network_id = result['id']
>>>> >>> ...
>>>> >>> mech_context =
driver_context.NetworkContext(self,
>>>> >>> context,
>>>> >>> result)
>>>> >>>
>>>> >>> self.mechanism_manager.create_network_precommit(mech_context)
>>>> >>>
>>>> >>> Also need to include new extension in the
>>>> >>> _supported_extension_aliases.
>>>> >>>
>>>> >>> So to avoid changes in the existing code, I was going to
create my
>>>> >>> own
>>>> >>> plugin (which will be very similar to Ml2Plugin) and use
it as
>>>> >>> core_plugin.
>>>> >>>
>>>> >>> Please advise the right solution implementing that.
>>>> >>>
>>>> >>> Regards,
>>>> >>> Nader.
>>>> >>>
>>>> >>>
>>>> >>> On Wed, Mar 5, 2014 at 11:49 PM, Aaron Rosen
<[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>>
>>>> >>> wrote:
>>>> >>>>
>>>> >>>> Hi Nader,
>>>> >>>>
>>>> >>>> Devstack's default plugin is ML2. Usually you wouldn't
'inherit'
>>>> >>>> one
>>>> >>>> plugin in another. I'm guessing you probably wire a
driver that
>>>> >>>> ML2 can use
>>>> >>>> though it's hard to tell from the information you've
provided what
>>>> >>>> you're
>>>> >>>> trying to do.
>>>> >>>>
>>>> >>>> Best,
>>>> >>>>
>>>> >>>> Aaron
>>>> >>>>
>>>> >>>>
>>>> >>>> On Wed, Mar 5, 2014 at 10:42 PM, Nader Lahouti
>>>> >>>> <[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>>
>>>> >>>> wrote:
>>>> >>>>>
>>>> >>>>> Hi All,
>>>> >>>>>
>>>> >>>>> I have a question regarding ML2 plugin in neutron:
>>>> >>>>> My understanding is that, 'Ml2Plugin' is the default
core_plugin
>>>> >>>>> for
>>>> >>>>> neutron ML2. We can use either the default plugin or
our own
>>>> >>>>> plugin (i.e.
>>>> >>>>> my_ml2_core_plugin that can be inherited from
Ml2Plugin) and use
>>>> >>>>> it as
>>>> >>>>> core_plugin.
>>>> >>>>>
>>>> >>>>> Is my understanding correct?
>>>> >>>>>
>>>> >>>>>
>>>> >>>>> Regards,
>>>> >>>>> Nader.
>>>> >>>>>
>>>> >>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>> >>>>> OpenStack-dev mailing list
>>>> >>>>> [email protected]
<mailto:[email protected]>
>>>> >>>>>
http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
>>>> >>>>>
>>>> >>>>
>>>> >>>>
>>>> >>>> _______________________________________________
>>>> >>>> OpenStack-dev mailing list
>>>> >>>> [email protected]
<mailto:[email protected]>
>>>> >>>>
http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
>>>> >>>>
>>>> >>>
>>>> >>> _______________________________________________ OpenStack-dev
>>>> >>> mailing
>>>> >>> list [email protected]
<mailto:[email protected]>
>>>> >>>
http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
>>>> >>>
>>>> >>> _______________________________________________
>>>> >>> OpenStack-dev mailing list
>>>> >>> [email protected]
<mailto:[email protected]>
>>>> >>>
http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
>>>> >>>
>>>> >>
>>>> >>
>>>> >> _______________________________________________
>>>> >> OpenStack-dev mailing list
>>>> >> [email protected]
<mailto:[email protected]>
>>>> >>
http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
>>>> >>
>>>> >
>>>> >
>>>> > _______________________________________________
>>>> > OpenStack-dev mailing list
>>>> > [email protected]
<mailto:[email protected]>
>>>> >
http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
>>>> >
>>>>
>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>> OpenStack-dev mailing list
>>>> [email protected]
<mailto:[email protected]>
>>>> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> OpenStack-dev mailing list
>>> [email protected]
<mailto:[email protected]>
>>> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> OpenStack-dev mailing list
>>> [email protected]
<mailto:[email protected]>
>>> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
>>>
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> OpenStack-dev mailing list
>> [email protected]
<mailto:[email protected]>
>> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
>>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> OpenStack-dev mailing list
> [email protected]
<mailto:[email protected]>
> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
>
_______________________________________________
OpenStack-dev mailing list
[email protected]
<mailto:[email protected]>
http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
_______________________________________________
OpenStack-dev mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
