On 03/21/2014 02:55 PM, Stefano Maffulli wrote: > On 03/20/2014 03:50 PM, Jay Lau wrote: >> It is better that we can have some diagram workflow just like >> Gerrit_Workflow <https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Gerrit_Workflow> to >> show the new process. > > Indeed, I think it would help. > > While I'm here, and for the records, I think that creating a new > workflow 'temporarily' only until we have Storyboard usable, is a *huge* > mistake. It seems to me that you're ignoring or at least underestimating > the amount of *people* that will need to be retrained, the amount of > documentation that need to be fixed/adjusted. And the confusion that > this will create on the 'long tail' developers. > > A change like this, done with a couple of announcements on a mailing > list and a few mentions on IRC is not enough to steer the ~400 > developers who may be affected by this change. And then we'll have to > manage the change again when we switch to Storyboard. If I were you, I'd > focus on getting storyboard ready to use asap, instead. > > There, I said it, and I'm now going back to my cave.
I think the current process and system and *so* broken that we can't afford to wait. Further, after talking to Thierry, it seems quite likely that we would continue using this exact process, even with Storyboard. Storyboard isn't a review tool and won't solve all of the project's problems. -- Russell Bryant _______________________________________________ OpenStack-dev mailing list OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.org http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev