yes, the bp also make sense to nova-cinder interaction, may I submmit a blueprint about that?
Any comments? 2014-04-09 3:58 GMT+08:00 Mike Perez <[email protected]>: > On 23:58 Tue 08 Apr , Lingxian Kong wrote: > > hi there: > > > > According to the patch https://review.openstack.org/#/c/80619/, Nova > > will wait for volume creation for 180s, the config option is rejected by > > Russell and Nikola. But the reason I raise it up is, we found the server > > creation failed due to timeout in our deployment, with LVM as Cinder > > backend. > > > > So, I wander is 180s really suitable here? Are there some guidences > > about when should we add an option? But at least, we should not avoid an > > option, just because of the existing overwhelming number of them, right? > > > > Thoughts? > > It looks like this was a temporary accepted solution and the long term > solution > is with event callbacks [1]. > > [1] - https://blueprints.launchpad.net/nova/+spec/admin-event-callback-api > > -- > Mike Perez > > _______________________________________________ > OpenStack-dev mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev > -- *---------------------------------------* *Lingxian Kong* Huawei Technologies Co.,LTD. IT Product Line CloudOS PDU China, Xi'an Mobile: +86-18602962792 Email: [email protected]; [email protected]
_______________________________________________ OpenStack-dev mailing list [email protected] http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
