This page actually has most of the answers on it: 
https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Blueprints#Nova

1: The time limit is one release: "at the end of each release, non-completed 
specs will be removed"
2: The "nova-drivers" team approves specs
3: No, it's not required to have a summit session. Something like that would be 
problematic, as
   blueprints could be proposed after summit.

Hope that helps.  IMHO, the nova-specs gerrit repository is a great way to 
review
blueprints.  I'm really liking it so far.

Best Regards,
Solly Ross

----- Original Message -----
From: "Kyle Mestery" <mest...@noironetworks.com>
To: "OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)" 
<openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org>
Sent: Tuesday, April 15, 2014 5:14:14 PM
Subject: [openstack-dev] [nova] [neutron] Gerrit spec reviews

Hi Nova developers:

I have a question around the new nova-specs gerrit repository. We're
implementing the same thing in Neutron for Juno (I'm hoping to make
this live tomorrow), but I had a few quick questions so I can build on
your experience with this so far:

1. Did you implement any sort of time limit on BPs in review? Mostly
around trying to triage the BPs as they come in.
2. Nova has a subset of the core-team which can actually approve BPs,
is this correct?
3. For all BPs submitted using the new procedure, is it required to
submit a Summit session?

Any guidance appreciated here!

Thanks,
Kyle

_______________________________________________
OpenStack-dev mailing list
OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.org
http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev

_______________________________________________
OpenStack-dev mailing list
OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.org
http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev

Reply via email to