Further to above details
please find related logs ...

*object server*

4:07:21:20 +0000] "DELETE
/vdb1/844/AUTH_215c458021024a8c87471157a7040644/suntmp7/objkeye385cf9c-ad96-423f-8c8d-94d001631f8b"
409 - "DELETE
http://www.example.com/v2/AUTH_215c458021024a8c87471157a7040644/suntmp7/objkeye385cf9c-ad96-423f-8c8d-94d001631f8b";
"txcb3b4b47278e483ca560e-005350d271" "proxy-server 9619" 0.0004

or

[22/Apr/2014:08:30:07 +0000] "DELETE
/vdb1/238/AUTH_215c458021024a8c87471157a7040644/zoom43/objkeyf03550a3-2be9-4b59-b12b-df75378aea14"
409 - "DELETE
http://www.example.com/v2/AUTH_215c458021024a8c87471157a7040644/zoom43/objkeyf03550a3-2be9-4b59-b12b-df75378aea14";
"tx0bc79d62fec445d28dfab-005356288f" "proxy-server 2142" 0.0005




On Wed, Apr 23, 2014 at 8:20 AM, Sumit Gaur <sumitkg...@gmail.com> wrote:

> Hi clay,
> Thanks for responding , first about setup , it is multi node env, and
> problem is with delete object .
>
> I checked proxy and storage nodes clock, they are in sync. Also storage
> node run only main daemons I.e. no auditor, and others.
>
> I traced the 409 call and it is coming from object server.
> I am generating random id for key so no reuse of same name.  But after one
> put(t1) next is del(t1).....is this could be a problem...I think they are
> sync calls.
>
> Regards
> Sumit
>
> On Apr 23, 2014 5:14 AM, "Clay Gerrard" <clay.gerr...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> > 409 on DELETE (object?) is a pretty specific error.  That should mean
> that the timestamp assigned to the delete is earlier than the timestamp of
> the data file.
> >
> > Most likely mean that you're getting some time-drift on your proxies
> (but that assumes multi-node) or maybe that you're reusing names between
> threads and your object server's see PUT(ts1) PUT(ts3) DELETE(ts2) - but
> that'd be a pretty tight race...
> >
> > Should all be logged - try and find a DELETE that went 409 and trace the
> transaction id.
> >
> >
> > On Mon, Apr 21, 2014 at 5:54 AM, taurus huang <huanggeng.8...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
> >>
> >> Please provide the log fileļ¼š /var/log/swift/swift.log   AND
> /var/log/keystone/keystone.log
> >>
> >>
> >> On Mon, Apr 21, 2014 at 11:55 AM, Sumit Gaur <sumitkg...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
> >>>
> >>> Hi
> >>> I using jclouds lib integrated with Openstack Swift+ keystone
> combination. Things are working fine except stability test. After 20-30
> hours of test jclouds/SWIFT start degrading in TPS and keep going down over
> the time.
> >>>
> >>> 1) I am running the (PUT-GET-DEL) cycle in 10 parallel threads.
> >>> 2) I am getting a lot of 409 and DEL failure for the response too from
> SWIFT.
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> Can sombody help me what is going wrong here ?
> >>>
> >>> Thanks
> >>> sumit
> >>>
> >>> _______________________________________________
> >>> OpenStack-dev mailing list
> >>> OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.org
> >>> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
> >>>
> >>
> >>
> >> _______________________________________________
> >> OpenStack-dev mailing list
> >> OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.org
> >> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
> >>
> >
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > OpenStack-dev mailing list
> > OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.org
> > http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
> >
>
>
_______________________________________________
OpenStack-dev mailing list
OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.org
http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev

Reply via email to