On Tue, 22 Apr 2014 19:46:06 -0400 Sean Dague <[email protected]> wrote: > > I think the policy about what's allowed to be not implemented or not > shouldn't be changing so quickly that it needs to be left to the > projects to decide after the fact. >
+1. I think it is extremely important that we gate on this so we don't accidentally start not supporting a feature and not realise for a long time. If the current situation is very complicated then perhaps a tool could be used to produce information about how things currently look based on where we currently get not implemented errors. But that still needs to be reviewed manually to ensure its reasonable and Tempest should not be trying to adapt dynamically. to feature suport disappearing. Chris _______________________________________________ OpenStack-dev mailing list [email protected] http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
