On 5/6/2014 1:48 PM, Thierry Carrez wrote: > Sandy Walsh wrote: >> I'd be curious to know more what "managed" means in this situation? Is >> the core project expected to allocate time in the IRC meeting to the >> concerns of these adjacent projects? What if the core project doesn't >> agree with the direction or deems there's too much overlap? Does the >> core team instantly have sway over the adjacent project? > It has to be basically the same team of people working on the two > projects. The goals and the direction of the project are shared. There > is no way it can work if you consider some "core" and some "adjacent", > that would quickly create a us vs. them mentality and not work out that > well in reviews. > > Of course, there can be contributors that are not interested in one > project or another. But if you end up with completely-separated > subteams, then there is little value in living under the same umbrella > and sharing a core team.
Ok, that's what I thought. Thanks for the clarification. -S _______________________________________________ OpenStack-dev mailing list OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.org http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev