Also, apologies for the crappy formatting. I like gv files as they're easily tracked in a text-based revision control system (like git) that depends on useful diffs to do code reviews. But sometimes the layout it chooses is a little dumb.
Stephen On Wed, May 14, 2014 at 10:18 AM, Stephen Balukoff <sbaluk...@bluebox.net>wrote: > Hi Craig, > > I'm attaching the latest object model diagram as discussed with the RAX > team last night, Samuel and Eugene. Note that we don't necessarily have > HP's blessing on this model yet, nor do we have Neutron core developer buy > in. But in any case, here it is. > > Also, I think the #openstack-lbaas channel is a great idea! > > Stephen > > > On Wed, May 14, 2014 at 9:05 AM, Craig Tracey <cr...@craigtracey.com>wrote: > >> Hi all, >> >> From what I heard last night, it sounds like there has been some >> consensus achieved around the LBaaS object model. Unfortunately, I missed >> this ad-hoc conversation. Is someone capturing this information and/or >> perhaps posting to the list? someplace else? >> >> On a related note, does it make sense to create an lbaas IRC topic >> channel? #openstack-lbaas? Just thinking that a dedicated channel might >> help to make the weekly meetings more productive with less crosstalk. >> Thoughts? >> >> Best, >> Craig >> >> _______________________________________________ >> OpenStack-dev mailing list >> OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.org >> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev >> >> > > > -- > Stephen Balukoff > Blue Box Group, LLC > (800)613-4305 x807 > -- Stephen Balukoff Blue Box Group, LLC (800)613-4305 x807
_______________________________________________ OpenStack-dev mailing list OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.org http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
