>> HA-Proxy version 1.4.24 2013/06/17 What was the reason this approach
>> was dropped?
> IIRC the major reason was that having 2 services on same port (but
> different interface) would be too confusing for anyone who is not aware
> of this fact.
Major part of documentation for haproxy with vip setup is done with
>From my experience lb solutions have been made with load balancer sitting
on VIRTUAL_IP:STANDART_PORT and/or PUBLIC_VIRTUAL_IP:STANDART_PORT.
Maybe this is not so big issue? It will be much easier to start with such
OpenStack-dev mailing list