On 05/22/2014 08:33 PM, Jeremy Stanley wrote: > On 2014-05-22 18:33:34 -0400 (-0400), Matthew Treinish wrote: > [...] >> I'd like to stick with one scheme and not decide to change it >> later on. I figured I should bring this out to a wider audience to >> see if there were other suggestions or opinions before I pushed >> out the tag, especially because the tags are primarily for the >> consumers of Tempest. > > I think as long as your release notes clearly indicate what you > think can safely be tested with a given release of Tempest, it > should be versioned just like any other piece of software (which is > to say, with version numbers chosen by one or more humans to reflect > the degree of improvement/breakage reflected within the release, a > la "Semantic Versioning").
Given that we're not really going to have major / minor bumps at this
point (more a continous roll), I might argue that we should just go
Firefox on it and bump the integer on every release.
Tempest 1 is now, Tempest 2 is Julyish, Tempest 3 is at Juno, Tempest 4
is next winter, etc.
-Sean
--
Sean Dague
http://dague.net
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
_______________________________________________ OpenStack-dev mailing list [email protected] http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
