-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA512 +1, I also don't see any significant value in using generic names instead of project names, while the drawbacks are obvious.
/Ihar On 23/05/14 14:30, Sergey Lukjanov wrote: > +1 for using program codename. > > So, we'll need to rename some existing program-named spec repos. > > On Fri, May 23, 2014 at 3:40 PM, Thierry Carrez <thie...@openstack.org> wrote: >> James E. Blair wrote: >>> [...] >>> When I look at the two of those, I have to admit that it's the second >>> one I find more intuitive and I'm pretty sure I'll end up calling it >>> 'sahara-specs' in common usage no matter the name. >> >> +1 >> >> Also the program "codename" is actually defined in programs.yaml: >> >> http://git.openstack.org/cgit/openstack/governance/tree/reference/programs.yaml >> >> It generally matches the name of the main project, but could potentially >> be different, in corner cases. >> >> -- >> Thierry Carrez (ttx) >> >> _______________________________________________ >> OpenStack-dev mailing list >> OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.org >> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev > > > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG/MacGPG2 v2.0.22 (Darwin) Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://www.enigmail.net/ iQEcBAEBCgAGBQJTf0AuAAoJEC5aWaUY1u57N+0H/3gsw+nBB3f+ilk0w7pgFpD3 pQaS96WwNn0crCXPdE+g/5/lyGHLCshyQXr9N/3HPJN0C9oM0bW9fh9F3uy6TJW3 ymHHl/GTqEW9Iz4A/omXUTsOhbWm2MnzUx0bLYEo3OOQS8ZB9p8lKfS0MfUPsDUk Tb46ABR7uf3rdzDxvYVdvPvwJaOP5rkASm2dxcmpQM6m9wWbewpkyagZr/FQfUW6 s+ZO6sAtSl940b6YkLO+jLixnI4EM08/2+xIXnKF0NHHjD9aJZfCoIhiZ9w0oonq 3lOWqT2RSV1/1Qqcs7G279cdDqrrmrD7eR+6xpTBxKQokw0BZ81oSXMz9S+TgSc= =0PM9 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- _______________________________________________ OpenStack-dev mailing list OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.org http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev