Hi Devananda I have 16 compute nodes, as your suggestion (you should use host aggregates to differentiate the nova-compute services configured to use different hypervisor drivers (eg, nova.virt.libvirt vs nova.virt.ironic) .
（1）I can set 4 of them with nova.virt.ironic(for bare metal provision) and left 12 of them with nova.virt.libvirt (for VM provision), they can work well together both for VM provision and Ironic provision ? of course I should use host aggregates to make 4 nodes as one aggregate and left 12 nodes as another aggregate. （2 ) should I replace the nova sheduler? the default nova scheduler(Filter Scheduler) can support this? 2014-06-06 1:27 GMT+08:00 Devananda van der Veen <[email protected]>: > There is documentation available here: > http://docs.openstack.org/developer/ironic/deploy/install-guide.html > > On Thu, Jun 5, 2014 at 1:25 AM, Jander lu <[email protected]> wrote: > > Hi, Devvananda > > > > I searched a lot about the installation of Ironic, but there is little > > metarial about this, there is only devstack with > > ironic( > http://docs.openstack.org/developer/ironic/dev/dev-quickstart.html) > > > > is there any docs about how to deploy Ironic on production physical node > > enviroment? > > > > thx > > > > > > > > 2014-05-30 1:49 GMT+08:00 Devananda van der Veen < > [email protected]>: > >> > >> On Wed, May 28, 2014 at 8:14 PM, Jander lu <[email protected]> wrote: > >>> > >>> Hi, guys, I have two confused part in Ironic. > >>> > >>> > >>> > >>> (1) if I use nova boot api to launch an physical instance, how does > nova > >>> boot command differentiate whether VM or physical node provision? From > this > >>> article, nova bare metal use "PlacementFilter" instead of > FilterScheduler.so > >>> does Ironic use the same method? > >>> ( > http://www.mirantis.com/blog/baremetal-provisioning-multi-tenancy-placement-control-isolation/ > ) > >> > >> > >> That blog post is now more than three releases old. I would strongly > >> encourage you to use Ironic, instead of nova-baremetal, today. To my > >> knowledge, that PlacementFilter was not made publicly available. There > are > >> filters available for the FilterScheduler that work with Ironic. > >> > >> As I understand it, you should use host aggregates to differentiate the > >> nova-compute services configured to use different hypervisor drivers > (eg, > >> nova.virt.libvirt vs nova.virt.ironic). > >> > >>> > >>> > >>> (2)does Ironic only support Flat network? If not, how does Ironic > >>> implement tenant isolation in virtual network? say,if one tenant has > two > >>> vritual network namespace,how does the created bare metal node > instance send > >>> the dhcp request to the right namespace? > >> > >> > >> Ironic does not yet perform tenant isolation when using the PXE driver, > >> and should not be used in an untrusted multitenant environment today. > There > >> are other issues with untrusted tenants as well (such as firmware > exploits) > >> that make it generally unsuitable to untrusted multitenancy (though > >> specialized hardware platforms may mitigate this). > >> > >> There have been discussions with Neutron, and work is being started to > >> perform physical network isolation, but this is still some ways off. > >> > >> Regards, > >> Devananda > >> > >> > >> _______________________________________________ > >> OpenStack-dev mailing list > >> [email protected] > >> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev > >> > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > > OpenStack-dev mailing list > > [email protected] > > http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev > > > > _______________________________________________ > OpenStack-dev mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev >
_______________________________________________ OpenStack-dev mailing list [email protected] http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
