On 10 June 2014 09:33, Mark McLoughlin <[email protected]> wrote: > Avoiding dragging the project into those sort of politics is something > I'm really keen on, and why I think the word "certification" is best > avoided so we can focus on what we're actually trying to achieve.
Avoiding those sorts of politics - 'XXX says it is a certified config, it doesn't work, cinder is junk' - is why I'd rather the cinder core team had a certification program, at least we've some control then and *other* people can't impose their idea of certification on us. I think politics happens, whether you will it or not, so a far more sensible stance is to play it out in advance. -- Duncan Thomas _______________________________________________ OpenStack-dev mailing list [email protected] http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
