Hi Yunhong, Thanks for the prompt response. For the second one, are you working on the existing bug, or a new one? If it’s a new bug, please let me know the bug number.
—Robert On 6/10/14, 5:09 PM, "Jiang, Yunhong" <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>> wrote: Hi, Robert For your first question, I suspect it’s something wrong and should be ‘devi_id’, which is the hypervisor’s identification for the device. I will leave Yongli to have more comments on it. For the second one, thanks for point the issue out. Yes, I’m working on fixing it. --jyh From: Robert Li (baoli) [mailto:[email protected]] Sent: Tuesday, June 10, 2014 1:46 PM To: Jiang, Yunhong; He, Yongli Cc: OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) Subject: [openstack-dev][nova][pci] A couple of questions Hi Yunhong & Yongli, In the routine _prepare_pci_devices_for_use(), it’s referring to dev[‘hypervisor_name’]. I didn’t see code that’s setting it up, or the libvirt nodedev xml includes hypervisor_name. Is this specific to Xen? Another question is about the issue that was raised in this review: https://review.openstack.org/#/c/82206/. It’s about the use of node id or host name in the PCI device table. I’d like to know you guys’ thoughts on that. thanks, Robert
_______________________________________________ OpenStack-dev mailing list [email protected] http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
