As far as I know, that’s the only non-standard port that needs to be opened in 
order to do 3rd party ci.
Ramy

From: Erlon Cruz [mailto:[email protected]]
Sent: Friday, June 13, 2014 4:03 AM
To: OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [Cinder] Third-Party CI Issue: direct access to 
review.openstack.org port 29418 required

Hi Asselin,

Do you had problems with other ports? Is it need to have outbound access to 
other ports?

Erlon


On Mon, Jun 9, 2014 at 2:21 PM, Asselin, Ramy 
<[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:
All,

I’ve been working on setting up our Cinder 3rd party CI setup.
I ran into an issue where Zuul requires direct access to 
review.openstack.org<http://review.openstack.org> port 29418, which is 
currently blocked in my environment. It should be unblocked around the end of 
June.

Since this will likely affect other vendors, I encourage you to take a few 
minutes and check if this affects you in order to allow sufficient time to 
resolve.

Please follow the instructions in section “Reading the Event Stream” here: [1]
Make sure you can get the event stream ~without~ any tunnels or proxies, etc. 
such as corkscrew [2].
(Double-check that any such configurations are commented out in: ~/.ssh/config 
and /etc/ssh/ssh_config)

Ramy (irc: asselin)

[1] http://ci.openstack.org/third_party.html
[2] http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Corkscrew_(program)





_______________________________________________
OpenStack-dev mailing list
[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>
http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev

_______________________________________________
OpenStack-dev mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev

Reply via email to