Please don't send review requests to the openstack-dev list. The correct procedure is outlined here: http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-dev/2013-September/015264.html
Thanks. -Ben On 06/12/2014 10:20 PM, Yuzhou (C) wrote: > Hi all, > > I have submit a blueprint about deferred deletion for volumes in cinder: > https://review.openstack.org/#/c/97034/ > > The implements of deferred deletion for volumes will introduce some > complexity, to this point, there are different options in stackers. So we > would like to get some feedback from anyone, particularly cloud operators. > > Here, I introduce the importance of deferred deletion for volumes > again. > Currently in cinder, calling the API of deleting volume means the volume > will be deleted immediately. If the user specify a wrong volume by mistake, > the data in the volume may be lost forever. To avoid this, I hope to add a > deferred deletion mechanism for volumes. So for a certain amount of time, > volumes can be restored after the user find a misuse of deleting volume. > Moreover, there are deferred deletion implements for instance in nova and > image in glance, I think it is very common feature to protected important > resource. > So I think deferred deletion for volumes is valuable, it seems to me > that should be sufficient. > > Welcome your feedback and suggestions! > > Thanks. > > Zhou Yu > > _______________________________________________ > OpenStack-dev mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev > _______________________________________________ OpenStack-dev mailing list [email protected] http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
