On Fri, Jun 13, 2014 at 2:01 PM, Mathew R Odden <[email protected]> wrote: > I am surprised this became a concern so quickly, but I do understand the > strangeness of installing a 'bash8' binary on command line. I'm fine with > renaming to 'bashate' or 'bash_tidy', but renames can take some time to work > through all the references. > > Apparently Sean and I both thought of the 'bashate' name independently (from > gpb => jeepyb) but I wasn't to keen on the idea since it isn't very > descriptive. 'bash-tidy' makes more sense but we can't use dashes in python > package names :( > > My vote would be for 'bashate' still, since I think that would be the > easiest to transition to from the current name. > When I first saw bashate, my eyes focused on "hate" in there for some reason. Not sure if others noticed this, but my advice would be to stay away from it for that reason. basheight has the same euphemism without the harshness, IMHO. Though now that I type this, I do see "height" in there, though it's less offensive than "hate".
Thanks, Kyle > Mathew Odden, Software Developer > IBM STG OpenStack Development > > > _______________________________________________ > OpenStack-dev mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev > _______________________________________________ OpenStack-dev mailing list [email protected] http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
