Fuelers, Andrew, I've talked to Sergey V. today about ML2 support in Fuel. Our current approach [1] is to port upstream puppet module for Neutron which has support of ML2, however our Neutron module is significantly diverged from upstream one (at least for Neutron HA deployment capabilities), as far as I understand. Basically, there is a risk that we will get unstable Neutron deployment in 5.1. Also, unless we have ML2, we are blocking others who rely on it, for example Mellanox.
To mitigate the risk, there is a suggestion to start the work in two parallel tracks: one is to continue porting of upstream puppet module, and another one - port the only ML2 part into Fuel Neutron puppet module. This will not take much time, but will allow us to have 5.1 reliable and with ML2 in case of instability after porting external module. Your opinion on this? [1] https://review.openstack.org/#/c/99807/1/specs/5.1/ml2-neutron.rst -- Mike Scherbakov #mihgen
_______________________________________________ OpenStack-dev mailing list [email protected] http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
