> > Id also like to propose that if we decide against doing this then these > > elements should not live in tripleo-image-elements. > > I'm not so sure I agree. We have lio and tgt because lio is on RHEL but > everywhere else is still using tgt IIRC.
Looks like we do have a cinder-tgt and a cinder-lio which we dont actually use anywhere, so you are correct. The mariadb-galera / percona-cluster elements are much more complex and active though, and seem very likely to have issues with forgetting to or incorrectly porting changes between them. It might also be a moot point if we end up making it a default. :) > > However, I also am not so sure that it is actually a good idea for people > to ship on MariaDB since it is not in the gate. As it diverges from MySQL > (starting in earnest with 10.x), there will undoubtedly be subtle issues > that arise. So I'd say having MariaDB get tested along with Fedora will > actually improve those users' test coverage, which is a good thing. > -- Gregory Haynes g...@greghaynes.net _______________________________________________ OpenStack-dev mailing list OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.org http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
