On 06/17/2014 10:43 AM, Stefano Maffulli wrote: > [trimming reply-to to OpenStack Development since I don't think that > infra is the right venue to discuss this] > > On 06/13/2014 10:08 AM, trinath.soman...@freescale.com wrote: >> I have two scenarios to deal with. >> >> [1] A change takes two months or more to get merged into the master >> branch. >> >> Here, if CI’s, delete the logs of the last month, the owner/reviewer >> may not be able to check the old logs. > > I think Trinath raises an important point, since merging may take well > more than 1 month. Is he the only one having this issue?
I don't see it as a huge problem. If a patch fails CI, I would expect the submitter to investigate in less than a month, and even if they don't, fresh new logs are just a recheck no bug away (we typically discourage that, but I think "the old logs expired" would be a legitimate reason to use it). > >> [2] A change is good and merged into the master branch. >> >> Here, if in future this change creates a BUG, a research on the CI >> logs might be a helpful to resolve this. > > I'm less interested about this, honestly, compared to issue #1 you raise > before. > > /stef > _______________________________________________ OpenStack-dev mailing list OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.org http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev